WASHINGTON: President Barack Obama plans to name a defense  official as special envoy to Myanmar who is expected to seek more help  from the repressive government’s neighbors in pressing for democratic  reform.
But building agreement on the best way to proceed  will be tricky. Southeast Asian nations have called for lifting  sanctions, which the US still opposes, while regional powers India and  China have their own strategic relationships with Myanmar and have shown  little appetite for meddling in its internal affairs.
To be  confirmed by the Senate, Derek Mitchell, who is now the deputy assistant  secretary of defense for Asian and Pacific security affairs, will  likely have to voice support for sanctions and opposition leader Aung  San Suu Kyi. That could make it tougher for the envoy to negotiate with  Myanmar’s dominant military once he is in the job, said David Steinberg,  a Myanmar expert at Washington’s Georgetown University.
Mitchell,  a China scholar with long experience in Asia, declined to comment on  his nomination, which is expected within a week and would require him to  give up his current job.
But a 2007 article he co-authored in  Foreign Policy magazine when he was director for Asia strategy at the  Center for Strategic and International Studies think tank, offers clues  on how he’d like to operate as envoy.
The article suggested  bringing the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, China, India, Japan  and the United States together in developing a road map that would lay  out benefits if Myanmar pursued true political reform and national  reconciliation, and the costs it would suffer if it continued to be  intransigent.
Since it was written, Myanmar has launched another  bloody crackdown on democracy protesters, continued brutal military  campaigns against ethnic minorities and seen thousands flee across its  borders. US officials also suspect Myanmar has nuclear ambitions and  imported some Scud missiles from North Korea — something Myanmar’s  neighbors would be worried about too.
In the past two years, the  Obama administration has retained sanctions but opened the door to  dialogue. But in its foreign policy, Myanmar has been eclipsed by the  wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, Iran’s nuclear program and recent turmoil  in the Middle East, among other issues.
Lawmakers and human rights  advocates have long pressed for an envoy for Myanmar to give it greater  attention. After abandoning America’s two-decade-long policy of  isolating Myanmar, the administration has periodically sent senior  officials to meet with Suu Kyi and the government, without making  headway. Washington says it remains open to dialogue.
Agreeing to  talk has at least removed an obstacle to US engagement with ASEAN, which  has become a focus for deepening American trade and security ties in  the region, countering the rising power of China. In a shift, ASEAN has  also voiced some criticism of recalcitrant member Myanmar and urged  reform.
T. Kumar of Amnesty International USA said that regional  diplomacy was the best way forward, although Myanmar has so far proved  deft in balancing its ties with China and India and resisting  international pressure.
Steinberg said Myanmar’s chief ally China  in particular would view US involvement with suspicion, and would likely  only weigh in and call for modest reform if Myanmar faced a mass  uprising or border fighting that threatened stability.
‘‘Working with ASEAN is the only route right now,’’ he said.
There  is glimmer of an opening. After five decades of military rule, Myanmar  has recently seen some political changes, albeit superficial ones.  Having rejected an election victory by Suu Kyi’s party in 1990, the  military organized polls last year that were viewed by most of the  international community as unfair. They ushered in a notionally civilian  government still dominated by the military.
It has freed Suu Kyi from years of house arrest, although it outlawed her party.
Some  European nations have now joined ASEAN in called for lifting sanctions —  even as rights groups, exiled Myanmar activists and some US lawmakers  seek to toughen them.

 
No comments:
Post a Comment